From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

New Treatment for Bronchiolitis in Infants

Nebulized 3% saline in conjunction with bronchodilators shortened hospital stay and lowered clinical severity.

Current therapy for treating bronchiolitis in infants is only supportive; however, in several earlier studies, researchers have evaluated whether administering nebulized 3% saline might reduce severity and speed recovery. In a meta-analysis conducted by the Cochrane Collaboration, investigators analyzed four randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) that involved 189 inpatients and 65 outpatients (age, <24 months).

In three inpatient RCTs, infants assigned to 3% saline had a significantly shorter mean length of stay (by 1 day) than infants who received 0.9% normal saline. In two inpatient RCTs and the single outpatient trial, infants who received 3% saline, versus those who received 0.9% saline, had a significantly lower mean postinhalation clinical score during the first 3 days of treatment.

Comment: These results are encouraging, but some caveats should be noted. In three of the four trials, bronchodilators (epinephrine and terbutaline) were added to the 3% saline regimens. In the other trial, physicians could opt to add albuterol and racemic epinephrine (used in 37% and 23% of children, respectively). Because the total number of patients was small, no meaningful data about side effects are available. Nevertheless, 3% saline, when combined with a bronchodilator, does seem to shorten length of hospital stay in children who are admitted with diagnoses of bronchiolitis.

Howard Bauchner, MD

Published in Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine May 13, 2009

Citation(s):

Zhang L et al. Nebulized hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 Oct 8. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006458.pub2)

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.