From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Is Renal Ultrasound After First UTI Necessary?

A normal prenatal renal ultrasound obviates the need for one post-UTI.

Some research suggests that renal ultrasound is not warranted after a first urinary tract infection (UTI) in young infants if their prenatal ultrasounds were normal (Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Feb 10 2003). To evaluate the concordance between prenatal renal ultrasound (RUS) and post-UTI RUS, Israeli physicians prospectively compared 209 children (age, ≤5 years) who were hospitalized with first simple UTIs.

Complete concordance of prenatal and post-UTI RUS findings occurred in 96% of cases. In only one patient with a normal prenatal RUS did the post-UTI examination reveal new abnormal findings that affected management. Even in that patient, no therapy was required for the anomaly. Seven children with normal prenatal RUSs had abnormal post-UTI findings. Children with normal prenatal RUSs were 17 times more likely to have normal post-UTI RUS findings than were children with abnormal prenatal RUSs. Six of the nine patients with abnormal post-UTI RUSs had vesicoureteral reflux. The predictive value of a normal prenatal RUS for predicting a normal post-UTI voiding cystourethrogram was 73%.

Comment: These findings demonstrate that prenatal RUS obviates the need for post-UTI RUS in children up to 5 years old. However, a normal prenatal RUS does not preclude the need for a voiding cystourethrogram.

F. Bruder Stapleton, MD

Published in Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine July 11, 2007

Citation(s):

Miron D et al. Is omitting post urinary-tract-infection renal ultrasound safe after normal antenatal ultrasound? An observational study. Arch Dis Child 2007 Jun; 92:502-4.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.