From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

An Outbreak of Measles: Who’s at Risk and Why?

Pockets of unvaccinated children put communities at risk.

Although measles is rare in the U.S., it continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the developing world. In 2005, a measles outbreak in Indiana involved 34 confirmed cases; the index patient was an unvaccinated 17-year-old girl who had recently returned from Romania.

Investigation of the outbreak indicated that of the 500 individuals (mostly aged 5–19 years) who attended a church event with the index patient during her prodrome, 16 of 50 (32%) unvaccinated attendees became infected, but only 2 of 450 (0.44%) vaccinated attendees became infected. Most (71%) of the school-aged cases were home-schooled. Reasons for refusing vaccination included concerns about autism or thimerosal and negative publicity about vaccination. The morbidity and public health costs associated with the outbreak were significant (nearly $5000 per patient).

Comment: Increasing pockets of unvaccinated children create a population at risk for more outbreaks. Most of the affected individuals were far past the age where autism would be a concern. Although it is difficult to change the minds of parents who oppose vaccination, pediatricians should continue to revisit the issue with these families and address their concerns by providing accurate information; for example, the MMR vaccine has never contained thimerosal. International travelers also should be encouraged to catch up on routine vaccinations.

— Peggy Sue Weintrub, MD

Published in Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine September 27, 2006

Citation(s):

Parker AA et al. Implications of a 2005 measles outbreak in Indiana for sustained elimination of measles in the United States. N Engl J Med 2006 Aug 3; 355:447-55.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.