From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Neonatal MRI: Highly Predictive of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes

Moderate-to-severe white-matter abnormalities predicted adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 2.

Predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature infants is important for parents and may help in the development of more precise interventions. In this prospective study, 167 preterm infants (gestational age at birth, ≤30 weeks) underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the gestational age of 40 weeks and were followed until 2 years of age.

Increasing severity of cerebral white-matter abnormalities was significantly related to cognitive and psychomotor delay, cerebral palsy, and neurosensory impairment at age 2 years. For example, infants with no white-matter disease had significantly higher Mental Development Index scores compared with infants with severe white-matter abnormalities (mean scores, 92 vs. 70). Sixty-seven percent of infants with severe white-matter disease had cerebral palsy versus 2% of those with no abnormalities.

Comment: Should all very premature infants undergo MRIs before discharge? Editorialists indicate that it is too soon to use these study results to advocate for routine use of MRI. Rather, given the uncertainty of predicting neurodevelopmental outcome, they believe in the advice: "Take them home, give them lots of love, and let’s see how things go." I tend to agree, until we are more certain about which findings predict which outcomes.

— Howard Bauchner, MD

Published in Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine September 13, 2006

Citation(s):

Woodward LJ et al. Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2006 Aug 17; 355:685-94.

Dammann O and Leviton A. Neuroimaging and the prediction of outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2006 Aug 17; 355:727-9.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.