From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

It’s Not Just Meconium . . .

These data support the neonatal resuscitation guideline recommending endotracheal intubation and suctioning only for infants who are nonvigorous at birth.

The neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) guidelines for infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) were revised in 2000 from routine endotracheal intubation and suctioning to selective intubation and suctioning only for neonates who are not vigorous at birth. Investigators at a single institution in Connecticut retrospectively evaluated the delivery room management and outcomes of term infants (gestational age, ≥37 weeks) before and after the guideline change.

The numbers of live births during the 3 years before and the 3 years after the guideline change were 12,927 and 11,718, respectively. Birth through MSAF occurred in 13.6% of deliveries before the change and in 13.1% afterward. The percentage of babies with thick or thin meconium did not differ during the two periods. Significantly more babies with MSAF were intubated before the guideline change than after the change (67% vs. 41%). Factors that were significantly associated with intubation were Apgar scores of 0 to 7, thickness of meconium (thick vs. thin), and year of birth (before vs. after the guideline change). Among infants born through MSAF, the incidences of meconium aspiration syndrome during the two time periods were statistically similar (0.85% before vs. 1.30% after). The incidence of respiratory distress from other than MSFA was 1.9% before and 1.4% after. Ten babies in both periods required mechanical ventilation. The authors concluded that since the guideline change, the percentage of babies who receive intubation has dropped with no change in respiratory complications.

Comment: These data support the change in the neonatal resuscitation program guideline in 2000 from routine to selective endotracheal intubation and suctioning for nonvigorous births. The results also show that invasive procedures such as intubation that are associated with risks can be reduced without an increase in respiratory distress. However, because many intubated neonates did not meet criteria for intubation based on the new NRP guidelines, we still have work to do to improve outcomes in such infants.

— William P. Kanto, Jr., MD

Published in Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine January 12, 2006

Citation(s):

Kabbur PM et al. Have the year 2000 neonatal resuscitation program guidelines changed the delivery room management or outcome of meconium-stained infants? J Perinatol 2005 Nov; 25:694-7.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.